This case is interesting only in terms of indemnity contract and insurance. It is about a dentist who was defending allegations in Queensland and NSW.
Guild Insurance Ltd v Hepburn [2014] NSWCA 400 (24 November 2014)
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
-
Facebook
-
Twitter
-
LinkedIn
-
Reddit
-
Tumblr
-
Google +1
-
Email
About the Author: Brad Wright
Related Posts
-
BUPA ANCILLARY RULES
-
Confused about Consent?
-
Was the regulator decision un-appealing ? (and what can you do about it?)
-
(No) Thanks For Referring ?
-
We are from the Government and We are here to Help….
-
Preparing for a Dental Council Inquiry
-
Really, is that it ?
-
Dental Board retires Guidelines on dental records 1/10/20.
-
Crisis Averted…
-
Where to turn ?
-
Do I have valid (informed) consent ?
-
WHAT IS WRONG WITH EMPLOYING DENTISTS ? If it looks like a duck, works like a duck, and is controlled like a duck, it’s probably a duck.
-
SHORT CASE NOTE Dental Corporation Pty Ltd v Moffet [2020] FCAFC 118. Do Dental Corporates have a problem with Service and Facility Agreements ?
-
Supervision II : When will it end ?
-
Supervision- how to handle it (I)
![SHORT CASE NOTE Dental Corporation Pty Ltd v Moffet [2020] FCAFC 118. Do Dental Corporates have a problem with Service and Facility Agreements ?](https://www.bwbarrister.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AdobeStock_87525179.jpeg)
